Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 23:54
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What do you say after "Hi" when chatting?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
How I’ll Remember Edmund White - Vulture
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Scientists Just Connected These Foods with an 80% Lower Risk of Cognitive Decline - EatingWell
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Strike by Safeway, Albertsons workers to start Sunday in 4 Colorado cities - The Denver Post
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Can someone with ADHD describe the feeling of paralysis and how it affects them?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
Nintendo will finally reveal more about Donkey Kong Bananza in new Direct - Polygon
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Quidem dolorum id soluta eius id maxime quas.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years: